|
Composition
and structure
Number of
members :
The Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 provides that the Court
consists of a Chief Justice and such other judges as are appointed.
There are currently 47 judges, including the Chief Justice.
Recruitment
procedure and incompatibilities :
Judges of the Court are appointed by the Governor-General on the
recommendation of the Government of Australia. Judges are appointed
from among judges of State and Territory courts or from among legal
practitioners of at least 5 years standing.
A judge is appointed
until he or she retires or attains the age of 70 years and under
the Australian Constitution may not be removed except by the Governor-General
on an address from both Houses of Parliament, in the same session,
praying for the judge's removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour
or incapacity.
Judges, other
than the Chief Justice, may hold more than one judicial office at
the one time. Judges may not however be involved in any business,
professional or commercial activity or relationship that may threaten
their independence or impartiality.
Many of the
judges have other commissions and appointments to other courts or
tribunals. These include positions as the President or a presidential
member of various Commonwealth administrative tribunals such as
the Administrative Appeal Tribunal, the National Native Title Tribunal,
the Australian Competition Tribunal, the Copyright Tribunal and
the Australian Industrial Relations Commission.
Internal
organization :
The Federal Court of Australia is a self-administering court. The
Chief Justice is responsible for managing the administrative affairs
of the Court in accordance with the Federal Court of Australia Act
1976, which is the Act of the Parliament of Australia that created
the Court.
The Chief Justice
may delegate any of his administrative powers to judges and is also
assisted by the Registrar in relation to the Court's administrative
affairs. The Registrar is appointed by the Governor-General on the
nomination of the Chief Justice.
In practice,
the administration of the Court is collegiate and involves a system
of judges committees dealing with specific aspects of the court's
jurisdiction and management.
In addition,
the management of the Court's business is assisted by 368 employees,
who are all members of the federal public service.
The Federal
Court also provides registry support to the Australian Competition
Tribunal, the Copyright Tribunal, the Defence Force Discipline Appeal
Tribunal and the Federal Police Disciplinary Tribunal.
Publications
:
The Court's important decisions are published in its official reports,
the 'Federal Court Reports' and all of its decisions are available
online through the Federal Court website.
The daily lists
of Court sittings in each State and Territory are made available
in each registry, online and through an email subscription service.
The Court publishes
an Annual Report detailing the management of the legal, administrative
and financial affairs of the Court during the year.
The Court also
provides a range of information for the public and community groups,
the media and practitioners, an informational booklet entitled 'Delivering
Justice', and an educational publication for use in schools entitled
'The Art of Delivering Justice'.
The majority
of these publications are available on its website: http://www.fedcourt.gov.au.
back
to top
Court
functions
Jurisdiction
:
The Federal Court of Australia is a national superior court of general
federal civil jurisdiction.
Its original jurisdiction is conferred by over 150 statutes of the
Australian Parliament. These laws cover matters such as judicial
review of administrative decisions, competition and consumer protection
law, workplace relations, migration law, human rights, taxation,
intellectual property, native title, admiralty, corporations law
and bankruptcy.
The Court also
exercises appellate jurisdiction over decisions of single judges
of the Court, decisions of the Supreme Court of Norfolk Island,
decisions of the Federal Magistrates Court and certain decisions
of Australian State Supreme Courts exercising federal jurisdiction.
The appellate jurisdiction is generally exercised by a bench of
three judges.
The Federal
Court's original and appellate jurisdiction in the judicial review
of administrative decision-making is of particular importance. The
Court hears appeals on points of law both directly against decisions
of Commonwealth officers and from decisions of Commonwealth administrative
tribunals, such as the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, the Copyright
Tribunal, the Competition Tribunal, the Refugee Review Tribunal
and the Migration Review Tribunal.
Some of the
points of law which be raised include error of law or excess of
jurisdiction (eg misinterpreting legislation, error of jurisdictional
fact), abuse of power (eg bad faith, power exercised for an improper
purpose, unreasonableness, taking into account irrelevant considerations
or failing to take into account relevant considerations) and failure
to accord procedural fairness (eg failing to give a proper hearing,
actual or apprehended bias).
For practical
purposes the Federal Court is the final court of appeal in most
administrative law cases. An appeal from the Federal Court to Australia's
highest court, the High Court of Australia is possible only by special
leave, which is rarely granted.
The Federal
Court is also a court in which the Commonwealth government may be
sued.
Organization
of the courts system :
The High Court of Australia, composed of 7 judges, is the highest
court in the Australian judicial system. The functions of the High
Court are to interpret and apply the law of Australia, to decide
cases of special federal significance including challenges to the
constitutional validity of laws and to hear appeals, by special
leave, from Federal, State and Territory courts.
In the federal
jurisdiction, there are two levels of courts below the High Court.
The lowest level is the Federal Magistrates Court, from which appeals
lie to the second level, the Federal Court and the Family Court.
These courts both exercise original as well as appellate jurisdiction.
As previously
stated, an important part of the Federal Court's original jurisdiction
includes the hearing of appeals on questions of law from a range
of federal administrative tribunals and an important part of the
Court's appellate jurisdiction is made up of appeals from administrative
law decisions of single Federal Court judges.
As a result
of the special leave requirement in the High Court, the Federal
Court is, in practice, generally the final avenue of appeal on questions
of law against administrative decisions.
The Commonwealth administrative tribunals are set up to review administrative
decisions of the Government of Australia made by federal Ministers,
departments or authorities, in various fields of activity. The Administrative
Appeals Tribunal in particular is the final avenue of appeal on
the merits against administrative decisions. It is charged with
reaching the correct or preferable decision.
Each State and
Territory also has its own judicial system, whose judges are appointed
by the State or Territory government. Generally, there are three
levels of court. A superior court called the Supreme Court, which
has appellate and some original jurisdiction in both civil and criminal
state matters. Supreme Courts also have jurisdiction to hear certain
federal matters. Below the Supreme Court is an intermediate court,
with a similar jurisdiction to the Supreme Court in state matters,
except that there are financial limits to the civil matters it can
try, and limits to the types of criminal offences it can try. Finally,
there is a lower or Magistrates' Court, from which appeals lie to
the intermediate court or the Supreme Court.
Many States
and Territories also have their own system of administrative tribunals,
from which appeals on questions of law lie to the State and Territory
courts.
Powers of
the judge :
When reviewing administrative decisions, a Federal Court judge only
has the power to consider the legality of the decision, not its
merits.
A judge may:
- affirm, reverse
or vary the decision or judgment appealed from; or
- set
aside that decision or judgment, in whole or in part, and remit
the proceeding to the administrative decision-maker from which the
appeal was brought for further hearing and determination, subject
to such directions as the Court thinks fit.
In cases where
the error of law identified requires a reconsideration of the factual
matrix surrounding the administrative decision, a judge will generally
remit the proceeding to the administrative decision-maker.
A Federal Court
judge also has the power to make an order as to which party shall
bear the costs of legal proceedings.
back
to top
Advisory
functions
Existence
and extent of an advisory authority :
The
Federal Court of Australia does not exercise any formal advisory
functions. Under the Australian Constitution, federal courts are
not permitted to perform such a role. Their jurisdiction is limited
to 'matters' or, in other words, existing legal controversies.
Authority
and publicity of advisory opinions :
Not
applicable
back
to top
Miscellaneous
remarks
The
Federal Court of Australia is, for the majority of administrative
decisions, the supreme body in Australia empowered to review the
legality of administrative decision-making. Its role is complemented
by that of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal as the supreme body
in Australia that is empowered to review the merits of administrative
decision-making and to make the correct or preferable decision.
For this
reason it is considered appropriate that the Federal Court of Australia
and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal jointly represent Australia
on the International Association of Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions.
|